#Battlerite ranks in comparison full
#Battlerite ranks in comparison professional

Doesn't change the fact that due to those 'occasional huge discrepancies in team strenghts' aka avg mmr - as I stated in my post - having a good winrate doesn't really matter. It's pretty much the same as in any other moba type game. So by increasing this value, you see 3x as much loss per point of variance you add. Point 2 makes it look worse, because the visible ranking is your mean rating minus 3x your variance. Point 1 is just 'rating lower', which reduces your rating. Because you lost against players the system expected you to beat, your 'variance' value will increase. Because you lost against lower-rated players, you lose a chunk off your mean rating.Ģ. If your opponents are rated lower than you within the grade (which they usually will be if you're the higher-skilled player in a pair), losing will have TWO effects that reduce your apparent rating:ġ. You get paired with a weaker player, and are facing off against 2 people in the same grade as yourself. But sure, lets walk you through what happens in the scenario you described: This is explained a LOT of times in multiple places, including 2 sticky threads about how the rating system works. As it is now you could have a <50 winrate and still climb as long as you win the 'right' matches. If only the matches would be more balanced mmr wise having a decent winrate would actually mean smth. So I was kinda shocked to see that it cost me 16 points eating up the 3 prior wins. After we lost I thought to myself at least I wont lose that many points. As you might imagine it didn't go well and we barely won one round. Me (10) getting paired with someone in placements vs 2 10s. The main reason might be those occasional huge discrepancies in team streanghs. So even while having a decent winrate climbing up feels unecessarly difficult.

I maintain a winrate around 70% yet I either break even or only get a few points. Автор сообщения: SilenI really enjoy this game, but the mm is frustrating as hell.

#Battlerite ranks in comparison professional

I just don't think a smaller indie title on Steam should require more dedication than professional Starcraft. Keep the discussion on how winning 30 games in a row for 200 MMR is perfectly fair and engaging if you wanna.

#Battlerite ranks in comparison full

This game is great fun, but very few people can afford to tackle it like it's a second full time no pay job.Įdit: After seeing just the amount of time and effort I'd have to put into this to actually climb, I've decided it's honestly not worth it. Right now, a rank can easily go past 100 matches depending on your luck and performance. Winning somewhere in the 50-70 range and losing somewhere in the 30-60 does wonders for Street Fighter's longevity and their playerbase's dedication.Ī rank should be somewhere in the 10-20 matches range.

It's much easier to just deal with your seventh loss in a row against ranks 12+ with an In Placement teammate when you're not gonna lose another 30 points that you'll painfully regain over 6 matches. This plan would kill two birds with one stone and greatly diminish toxicity too. In the long run, it's always better to have a happy playerbase than one that's constantly frustrated.

Shamelessly reward good performance, specially against those of higher rank, and don't punish bad performance too hard. The ranking system should play out more like a fighting game. This does not play to some of the game's strengths, those being quick rounds and small numbers.īecause we're small teams, keeping a winrate that reflects your skill is somewhat easier than in say, League of Legends. The matchmaking is distinctly MOBA-like, going for thousands upon thousands of matches. This is a MOBA game, but it's a smaller one. Right now, climbing a rank is a tall order.